mosml 2.0 bug report
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > I am curious if you have any thoughts on doing this. The main thing
> > I am worried about is performance (both run time and space). But I
> > am also interested to hear your thoughts on the simplicity and
> > suitability of the IL that the frontend generates. Thanks for any
> > info.
> The intermediate language is a standard untyped lambda language
> extended with let, exception handlers etc. Maybe it's a problem in
> your setting that it's untyped -- I haven't studied MLton internals.
Yes. As MLton is based on typed ILs, we would definitely need type info. An
explicitly type-annotated module level program would work well. I'm just
starting to look into the mosml sources to see if there's anything like that.