Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
> > I agree with Henry. I think the right way to split is to partition the toplevel
> > functions into disjoint sets, with one set per assembly file. A new chunkifier
> > that does that should be trivial.
> Sounds reasonable. Can we leverage the existing chunkifier to get us
> partially there? My first thought would be to use the existing chunkifier
> with ChunkPerFunc which would give us a minimum granularity. I haven't
> looked at too many programs, but I would think that one assembly file per
> func is too many. So, probably do some sort of quick bin-packing of
> chunks into super-chunks with approximately the right number of statements
> per assembly file.
I would just use ChunkPerFunc, and then in your backend, start spitting out
chunks to a file until you pass some threshold number of statements.