forwarded message from Henry Cejtin

[Stephen Weeks]

Received: from maguro.epr.com ([198.3.162.27]) by exchange.epr.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id NB40XRSN; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:06:34 -0700
Received: from magrathea.epr.com (firewall-user@magrathea.epr.com [198.3.160.1])
	by maguro.epr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21717
	for <sweeks@intertrust.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magrathea.epr.com (8.8.4/8.7.3) id QAA16463 for <sweeks@intertrust.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc245.edi.nunet.net(199.249.165.245) by magrathea.epr.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma016358; Tue, 20 Jun 00 16:07:41 -0700
Received: (from henry@localhost)
	by syzygy.clairv.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA03649
	for sweeks@intertrust.com; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:07:40 -0500
Message-Id: <200006202307.SAA03649@syzygy.clairv.com>
From: Henry Cejtin <henry@clairv.com>
To: sweeks@intertrust.com
Subject: Re: new backend and save world
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:07:40 -0500

Like I said, the only case you might be pimped on (other than dynamic loading)
is if you do a dump, then some one replaces the shared library you were using
with a newer version and then you restart.  Even then, you would only be
pimped if the return address was into the library.
I.e., I agree: ignore the problem.