fib, new primitives, and useless analysis
Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:43:24 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Stephen Weeks wrote:
> > WRONG!!!! What about overflow exceptions. I realize that they aren't
> > being done now, and perhaps that is why it does this, but in general you
> > really have to do the add to make sure that the exception happens at the
> > right time.
> But MLton doesn't do overflow exceptions for Int.+, Int.*, Int.-.
> Given this, isn't the optimization semantics preserving?
In general, though, I think that optimization needs some tweaking. It's
coming about because there is an implicit assumption that Prim's do not
side-effect. (true?) We can continue the debate about whether or not Int.+
should or should not raise Overflow, but certainly FFI's should be