Time bug work around

Henry Cejtin henry@sourcelight.com
Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:47:05 -0500


Note, I have seen different bugs on 2.2 and 2.4 kernels.  Given that we don't
return any of the other fields from MLton.Rusage.rusage, why not just use
times().  I know that I recommended against it before because it is old
fashioned, but it IS atomic so I would just use that.  It is trivial to
change the C code and leave the structure MLton.Rusage the same as it is.
Isn't this clearly the way to go?