regexps

[Stephen Weeks]

> Wow, not bad.  Of course the stupid web page is an incredible pain.  I had
> to copy and paste it to sort it to make sure we are doing well.

Hmm.  Works ok for me, both with and without style sheets.

> Still, it is sad we don't beat Ocaml byte code by a huge amount.

Yeah, I am quite confused by this.  I will send Doug mail.

> Also something must be really wrong with the word frequency test.  In addition
> to being more lines of code than C, we are also more than 10 times slower than
> Ocaml.  What is going on here?

It's probably just my stupid hashing.  I'll look into it.

> Still, nice to be up there.

Definitely.  We will be on top soon enough :-)