not THAT bad

Henry Cejtin henry@sourcelight.com
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:10:22 -0500


In  the CHANGES file, for 2000-5-30, the bug that caused polymorphic equality
to return true when it shouldn't have, you should explicitly say that it only
did  this  if  the  constructor  was unused or something.  (I know that isn't
quite right.)  As is, it really looks like a much worse bug than  it  was  (I
think).

In 2000-2-12, the match compiler problem, it isn't clear from the description
if this is talking about a compile time speed-up  or  a  run  time  speed-up.
This should be made clear.

In 2000-11-8, algebraic laws to the CPS shrinker, change
    specifically target to IntInf primitives
to
    specifically targeted to IntInf primitives
    IntInf