contification paper

[Matthew Fluet]

> > I guess, but that doesn't show that the actual transformation isn't that
> > costly.  Maybe take the max of all the times?  Or, just say that the
> > estimated transformation time (say, contify time of {call,cont,dom} -
> > contify time of none) was never more than X% of the total compile time,
> > where X is some small number
> > 
> > (One thing that is interesting is mlyacc, where None has the highest
> > percentage, simply because it has so many functions at the later passes.) 
> 
> How about even simpler.  The table just has lines and total compile time, and we 
> say in the text that contification never takes more than 4% of compile time.
> 

Sure, that's good.  Do you want me to hack the scripts?