Word32.word -> Int32.int

Stephen Weeks MLton@sourcelight.com
Tue, 29 May 2001 09:53:16 -0700

> Is it true that In32 is never mentioned in the basis library? 

As far as I know.

> If that is true
> then I guess that it makes some (but not much) sense.  Still, it would have
> been better to use something like the Position structure.  The problem is that
> with the current set up, IntInf's are going to be used in MLton for no reason.

Yeah.  The only solution I can see is a compiler switch that makes LargeInt =
Int.  I don't think that would be too hard.