[MLton-devel] nucleic benchmark

[Matthew Fluet]

> Did you try to get any times for SML/NJ?  I'm curious if the
> change in the benchmark altered the relative timing ratio
> between MLton and NJ.

MLton0 -- mlton.cvs.HEAD -native true
MLton1 -- mlton.cvs.HEAD -native false
SML/NJ -- SML/NJ
compile time
benchmark MLton0 MLton1 SML/NJ
nucleic    78.50  17.61   3.46
run time
benchmark MLton0 MLton1 SML/NJ
nucleic    41.95  51.49  25.66
run time ratio
benchmark MLton1 SML/NJ
nucleic     1.23   0.61
size
benchmark  MLton0  MLton1  SML/NJ
nucleic   191,002 173,166 393,200

That's with SML/NJ 110.42.  The numbers on the mlton.org site (with
mlton-20020293 and SML/NJ 110.41) give a ratio of 0.4.  So, there is still
something "missing" in the way we compile nucleic.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm 
Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel