[MLton-devel] Re: MLton and profiling

[Stephen Weeks]

> I definitely like the idea of evolving SML, but wasn't this pretty much
> killed by Milnor's comment on the implementors list rejecting any change
> to the language called SML?

Yes, and I support that.  But SML+ or SML04 or whatever seems fine to
me.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
MLton-devel mailing list
MLton-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlton-devel