[MLton] HOL's Moscow ML implementation, and pushing MLton to
Daniel C. Wang
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:03:36 -0400
Oh, I must have grossly misread your code.. originally.. I see what you are
getting at now.
My example code fixed a universal type, and had the host code deal with the
mismatch between native and universal type. What you are suggesting is that
we do the reverse. Fix a representation that's good for the host and make
the hosted code deal with the rep mismatch. I think that this makes perfect
One question comes up. Does this mean the interpter has to be rewritten to
acess its universal type via some abstract interface?