[MLton] mlton.org server

[Colin Fleming]

For what it's worth, GitHub does offer web hosting (for free, no
less): http://pages.github.com. The other criticisms of it do stand
though.

Allura does look like it's a good step up from the current
SourceForge, although IMO the UI still feels a little clumsy in the
same way that the SF UI did to me. Obviously I've not used it for a
real project though, and it does seem quite complete.

I agree with your concerns about self-hosting a Forge install - I
don't see that as a big win over the current state of affairs, I
suspect the amount of maintenance would be similar.

Cheers,
Colin


On 4 April 2011 21:56, Matthew Fluet <matthew.fluet at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Stephen Weeks <sweeks at sweeks.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to bring up the topic of handing off the administration of mlton.org
>> (mail, web, svn), so I can stop maintaining the current mlton.org server.  This
>> is by no means urgent, but I simply do not have time to do a good job of
>> maintaining the server which is becoming more and more stale.  I'd like to
>> transfer before the lack of good administration bites us.
>> Options are to go to another server maintained by someone else, or to use hosted
>> solutions for individual services.  I lean toward the latter.  Whatever we do, I
>> think it would be good to get something that we believe will work for at least a
>> 5-year time frame.
>> Thoughts?  Volunteers?
>
> Are there any other thoughts on migrating mlton.org content?  I'm
> especially keen to hear if there are any other alternatives to those
> raised previously.
>
> Looking at the Wikipedia comparison of open source software hosting
> facilities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_software_hosting_facilities),
> there are not many options that provide web hosting and mailing lists,
> and fewer that aren't macro-project specific.  For instance, neither
> BitBucket nor GitHub offer web hosting or mailing lists (not to
> mention, being VCS specific).
>
> It occurs to me that something between self-hosting and using a
> software hosting service is to self-host a software hosting service.
> That is, run a virtual machine instance on which one installs an
> instance of GForge (http://gforge.org/gf/) or FusionForge
> (https://fusionforge.org/).  The (hoped for) reduced administration
> comes from the fact that the forge installation should handle all of
> the dependencies on sub-services (web, mailman, VCSs).  But, still,
> some non-trivial administration overhead.  Also, it requires someone
> to administer updates to the forge installation, whereas with a
> software hosting service, such service upgrades would be provided.
> So, not clear to me whether or not it would be a win.  Though, it
> might fit well with a proposed "Standard ML Foundation", though I'm
> still unclear about the financials/logics of such an arrangement.
>
> For those who raised concerns about SourceForge, it might be worth
> looking at Allura (https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/home/), the
> SourceForge Beta framework.  It is available to new projects but at
> some point should become available for existing projects.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLton mailing list
> MLton at mlton.org
> http://mlton.org/mailman/listinfo/mlton
>